ARG Outlier Media Private Limited Vs Rayadu Vision Media  Limited

Table of Contents:

Introduction

  • Background of the case
  • The dispute over the use of Republic TV’s emblem by RTV The Parties Involved
  • ARG Outlier Media Private Limited
  • Rayadu Vision Media Limited
republic tv
Bombay High Court Rejects Republic TV's Interim Request for Injunction Against RTV's Use of 'R' Emblem 2
  1. Chronology of Events
    • Rayadu Vision Media’s claim of using the RTV logo since 2007
    • Republic TV’s interim petition to halt RTV’s use of the “R” emblem
    • The trademark infringement complaint against RTV News
  2. Republic TV’s Allegations
    • ARG’s claim of founding Republic TV in 2016
    • Accusations of fraudulent adoption of a similar brand by RTV
    • The alleged exploitation of Republic TV’s goodwill
  3. Court Decision
    • The rejection of Republic TV’s interim relief by Bombay High Court
    • The role of Justice Manish Pitale
  4. Subsequent Legal Action
    • ARG Outlier’s lawsuit filed in the Supreme Court
    • Allegations of infringement and passing off of Republic TV’s “R” trademark
    • Republic TV’s request for damages amounting to Rs 100 crore
  5. RTV’s Defense
    • RTV’s claim of using the RTV mark since 2007
    • The assertion of being an “honest user” due to the name’s connection with the owner’s family
  6. Legal Representation
    • Senior Counsel Nikhil Sakhardande representing ARG Outlier
    • Senior Counsel Sharan Jagtiani and Advocate Hiren Kamod representing Rayadu Vision Media
  7. Conclusion
    • Overview of the case’s current status
    • Anticipated developments in the legal proceedings